<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WWWhat in the World Wide Web &#187; laziness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theworldwidewebdotcom.net/tag/laziness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theworldwidewebdotcom.net</link>
	<description>If you wish to make a blog from scratch, you must first invent the universe.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:56:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Weezer hates you</title>
		<link>http://theworldwidewebdotcom.net/2008/04/24/weezer-hates-you/</link>
		<comments>http://theworldwidewebdotcom.net/2008/04/24/weezer-hates-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Words and Expressions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laziness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theworldwidewebdotcom.net/glob/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rumors seem to be true&#8212;the new Weezer album is going to be untitled, with a picture of the (increasingly fugly) band members against a solid-color background. This time, it&#8217;s red. I just don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re even trying anymore. I read a review of their last one that said it was so bad it&#8217;d make [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rumors seem to be true&#8212;the new Weezer album is going to be untitled, with a picture of the (increasingly fugly) band members against a solid-color background. This time, it&#8217;s red. I just don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re even trying anymore. I read a review of their last one that said it was so bad it&#8217;d make you retroactively hate their good stuff (ie, &#8220;Blue&#8221; and &#8220;Pinkerton&#8221;). They were right. I heard part of a song on the radio, and ended up retro-hating 2/3 of &#8220;Blue&#8221;! But <em>this </em>news makes me have a fully charged retro-hate-on. It&#8217;s so bad I now hate Rivers&#8217; second grade teacher.</p>
<p>If you need a Red Album to rock out with, may I suggest:</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Red" href="http://www.amazon.com/30th-Anniversary-Remastered-King-Crimson/dp/B00065MDSQ/">King Crimson</a>: The title track shreds like a corrupt accountant</li>
<li><a title="The Red Record" href="http://www.amazon.com/Red-Record-Loudermilk/dp/B00006JY9P/">Loudermilk</a>: Glam bam thank you ma&#8217;am? Yes!</li>
<li><a title="Red Album" href="http://www.amazon.com/Red-Album-Baroness/dp/B000TXG3YA/">Baroness</a>: Nothing rocks harder than this. I&#8217;d have bought the CD even if it just had the first two songs. Has the best (red-themed) album art: an <em>Alphonse Mucha in hell</em> type thing.</li>
</ul>
<p>Speaking of color-themed/self-titled albums, someone should to a tribute to the mother of them all: The Beatles&#8217; &#8220;White Album&#8221;. But instead of calling it &#8220;The White Album&#8221;, they should call it &#8220;The Beatles&#8221;. Oh, the lawsuits it would bring!</p>
<p>Speaking of self-titled albums, I&#8217;ve always thought that when a band/artist released a self-titled album late in their career, it was a sign they were in creative trouble. They&#8217;re trying to &#8220;redefine&#8221; themselves or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theworldwidewebdotcom.net/2008/04/24/weezer-hates-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

